A Puff of Logic

Your awesome Tagline

203 notes

atlinmerrick:

Here’s my absolute favourite exchange between John and Sherlock in the canon stories. Sherlock plans on breaking into Charles Augustus Milverton’s house:

WATSON: Well I don’t like it, but I suppose it must be. When do we start?
HOLMES: You are not coming.
WATSON: Then you are not going.

Watson then uses threats, guilt, and bad arse-ry to insist he’s coming along. Sherlock relents, reflecting that they’ve lived together for years, they might as well share a prison cell, too.
— The Adventure of Charles Augustus Milverton

atlinmerrick:

Here’s my absolute favourite exchange between John and Sherlock in the canon stories. Sherlock plans on breaking into Charles Augustus Milverton’s house:

WATSON: Well I don’t like it, but I suppose it must be. When do we start?

HOLMES: You are not coming.

WATSON: Then you are not going.

Watson then uses threats, guilt, and bad arse-ry to insist he’s coming along. Sherlock relents, reflecting that they’ve lived together for years, they might as well share a prison cell, too.

— The Adventure of Charles Augustus Milverton

19,177 notes

angelfeathersintheimpala:

The marauders sitting in the common room doing homework and James is reading for an assignment and he thinks it’s stupid and just yells “are you fucking serious?!”

Remus says “yes” before thinking it through and begins contemplating a jump off the astronomy tower. Sirius looks momentarily horrified then Peter passes over a galleon to James and they move on with their homework as if it never happened.

(via caswithashotgun)

13,688 notes

"Should parents read their daughter's texts or monitor her online activity for bad language and inappropriate content?"

mildlyamused:

daeranilen:

daeranilen:

Earlier today, I served as the “young woman’s voice” in a panel of local experts at a Girl Scouts speaking event. One question for the panel was something to the effect of, "Should parents read their daughter’s texts or monitor her online activity for bad language and inappropriate content?"

I was surprised when the first panelist answered the question as if it were about cyberbullying. The adult audience nodded sagely as she spoke about the importance of protecting children online.

I reached for the microphone next. I said, “As far as reading your child’s texts or logging into their social media profiles, I would say 99.9% of the time, do not do that.”

Looks of total shock answered me. I actually saw heads jerk back in surprise. Even some of my fellow panelists blinked.

Everyone stared as I explained that going behind a child’s back in such a way severs the bond of trust with the parent. When I said, “This is the most effective way to ensure that your child never tells you anything,” it was like I’d delivered a revelation.

It’s easy to talk about the disconnect between the old and the young, but I don’t think I’d ever been so slapped in the face by the reality of it. It was clear that for most of the parents I spoke to, the idea of such actions as a violation had never occurred to them at all.

It alarms me how quickly adults forget that children are people.

Apparently people are rediscovering this post somehow and I think that’s pretty cool! Having experienced similar violations of trust in my youth, this is an important issue to me, so I want to add my personal story:

Around age 13, I tried to express to my mother that I thought I might have clinical depression, and she snapped at me “not to joke about things like that.” I stopped telling my mother when I felt depressed.

Around age 15, I caught my mother reading my diary. She confessed that any time she saw me write in my diary, she would sneak into my room and read it, because I only wrote when I was upset. I stopped keeping a diary.

Around age 18, I had an emotional breakdown while on vacation because I didn’t want to go to college. I ended up seeing a therapist for - surprise surprise - depression.

Around age 21, I spoke on this panel with my mother in the audience, and afterwards I mentioned the diary incident to her with respect to this particular Q&A. Her eyes welled up, and she said, “You know I read those because I was worried you were depressed and going to hurt yourself, right?”

TL;DR: When you invade your child’s privacy, you communicate three things:

  1. You do not respect their rights as an individual.
  2. You do not trust them to navigate problems or seek help on their own.
  3. You probably haven’t been listening to them.

Information about almost every issue that you think you have to snoop for can probably be obtained by communicating with and listening to your child.

Information about almost every issue that you think you have to snoop for can probably be obtained by communicating with and listening to your child.

(via lauralienstuff)